<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for see-dream.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://see-dream.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://see-dream.com</link>
	<description>Michael Todd Thorpe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Good Old Days by Mick</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=496&#038;cpage=1#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=496#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Those look really good.  Great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those look really good.  Great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not So Quiet by Mick</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=495&#038;cpage=1#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=495#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Hang in there.  I admire your diligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang in there.  I admire your diligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Parking by DM</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=492&#038;cpage=1#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>DM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=492#comment-468</guid>
		<description>A total break is good. It&#039;s also good to get out of the instant gratification thing. Ignore the review screen on the digi or shoot film. I find that looking at my pics for the first time a week  after shooting is very refreshing. There more detachment of subject from photo that helps me evaluate what I&#039;ve got.  BTW I like this pic much better on the white background than the black on PBase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A total break is good. It&#8217;s also good to get out of the instant gratification thing. Ignore the review screen on the digi or shoot film. I find that looking at my pics for the first time a week  after shooting is very refreshing. There more detachment of subject from photo that helps me evaluate what I&#8217;ve got.  BTW I like this pic much better on the white background than the black on PBase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Polaroid By Ilford? by dm</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=490&#038;cpage=1#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>dm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=490#comment-464</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all very confusing. Polaroid in their ultimate cleverness,  gave us 600 film, and 6xx film, which are, logically enough, completely different incompatible systems. 600 is the modern point and shoot click - buzz - watch the pic develop in front of your eyes motorised affair. The earlier 6xx film cameras which use 669, 665, 667, 690 etc film are full of good old fashioned, check the temperature, pull the film through the rollers, count the seconds, peel-apart, real-deal Polariod goodness. Both are cool, but the peel-apart cameras are uber cool.  Folding bellows, real glass lenses and Zeiss rangefinders on the top end models. Todd, of course, has the later.  Film for these is still available from Fuji, and is better than the real Polaroid offerings, but another competitor would keep them on their toes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all very confusing. Polaroid in their ultimate cleverness,  gave us 600 film, and 6xx film, which are, logically enough, completely different incompatible systems. 600 is the modern point and shoot click &#8211; buzz &#8211; watch the pic develop in front of your eyes motorised affair. The earlier 6xx film cameras which use 669, 665, 667, 690 etc film are full of good old fashioned, check the temperature, pull the film through the rollers, count the seconds, peel-apart, real-deal Polariod goodness. Both are cool, but the peel-apart cameras are uber cool.  Folding bellows, real glass lenses and Zeiss rangefinders on the top end models. Todd, of course, has the later.  Film for these is still available from Fuji, and is better than the real Polaroid offerings, but another competitor would keep them on their toes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Polaroid By Ilford? by Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=490&#038;cpage=1#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=490#comment-463</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link to the article. I&#039;ll keep my fingers crossed, too.
Cheryl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to the article. I&#8217;ll keep my fingers crossed, too.<br />
Cheryl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Smoke On The&#8230; by Mick</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=468&#038;cpage=1#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=468#comment-458</guid>
		<description>Yeah, me too.  And it&#039;s lengthy!  And has a nice variety of instrumentation.  Then when the vocals start, you go, Man, this is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, me too.  And it&#8217;s lengthy!  And has a nice variety of instrumentation.  Then when the vocals start, you go, Man, this is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LJ Consolidated by Mick</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=423&#038;cpage=1#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=423#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Did it work again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did it work again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thunderclouds by Mick</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=52&#038;cpage=1#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 03:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=52#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Do I do this right as I am now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I do this right as I am now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thunderclouds by todd</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=52&#038;cpage=1#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=52#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thunderclouds by Mick</title>
		<link>http://see-dream.com/?p=52&#038;cpage=1#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://see-dream.com/?p=52#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Beautiful, beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful, beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
